Search found 23 matches

by Spass
Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:50 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Multiple attackers?
Replies: 3
Views: 662

Re: Multiple attackers?

Yeah, seems like it was just a "future proofing" for some new potential interactions, which finally never landed in the game.

EDIT: It's confirmed by a judge on WoW TCG Discord channel.
by Spass
Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:50 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Multiple attackers?
Replies: 3
Views: 662

Re: Multiple attackers?

Hello Aggro . Well, there's no such thing as multiple attackers as far as I know, so I'm not sure why there's "attackers" printed on Blink (but I'll try to investigate on that topic, I'll let you know). But it just means to remove a character that is attacking your hero from combat. And only that co...
by Spass
Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:21 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Play with own deck or draft only?
Replies: 1
Views: 1746

Re: Play with own deck or draft only?

Hello. If you want to play online with your own deck I know that there's an active group of people who play constructed (and raids) via Tabletop Simulator. You can see more info here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/wowtcg Discord is probably the best way to contact them directly and arrange some p...
by Spass
Thu May 04, 2017 11:14 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Cost X
Replies: 2
Views: 2277

Re: Cost X

No, I don't think Khadgar can lower the cost of "X" abilities. They are treated as 0 cost cards until you play them for a chosen value.
by Spass
Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:52 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Magistrix Valthin
Replies: 3
Views: 2337

Re: Magistrix Valthin

No problem. Too bad there isn't a way to get verified answer from a WoW TCG judge or rules expert nowadays. The only place I know outside this forum where potentially are some people with advanced rules knowledge is /r/wowtcg Reddit. And maybe WoW TCG Discord.
by Spass
Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:56 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Magistrix Valthin
Replies: 3
Views: 2337

Re: Magistrix Valthin

I think you're right and I would assume the same conclusion.
by Spass
Fri Mar 31, 2017 5:19 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Advanced gameplay questions
Replies: 3
Views: 2209

Re: Advanced gameplay questions

Your terminology isn't lacking, I play Magic too and I know that sometimes it's easier to explain things "the Magic way". But sometimes it could bring confusion, so I prefer to use WoW TCG phrasing whenever possible. This rule explains playing non-instant cards: 409.1 "A player can play a non-instan...
by Spass
Fri Mar 31, 2017 12:44 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Advanced gameplay questions
Replies: 3
Views: 2209

Re: Advanced gameplay questions

Hello. I will try to base my reply on World of Warcraft TCG Comprehensive Rules version 7.4 I'm not a rules expert, just a player, so if someone thinks I'm wrong, please correct me. 1) Small thing, allies in WoW TCG aren't "summoned", they're "played". Totems count as allies, so you can't exhaust th...
by Spass
Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:42 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Can heroes attack without a weapon? And more.
Replies: 6
Views: 4792

Re: Can heroes attack without a weapon? And more.

Well, since I created this topic I know much more about WoW TCG rules so I can clarify. My assumption is that you would be attacking with melee damage, but I don't like to assume when it comes to the rules, so it's hard to say. Yes, rule 408.3a is about that - "For packets created during combat conc...
by Spass
Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:41 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: highlord Bolvar and choosing effect cards
Replies: 4
Views: 2933

Re: highlord Bolvar and choosing effect cards

Do you mean one of these two?

Hammer of Ragnaros - Destroy target ability, ally, or equipment. Its controller destroys another one of his abilities, allies, or equipment.
Lava Pool - Destroy target ability, ally, or equipment.

Both of them say "target", so it goes to Bolvar.